Infertile couples often come to us
for a second opinion with thick files bulging with
the results of numerous medical tests and investigations.
While some of these tests are useful, the sad fact
is that many of these tests are a complete waste of
the patient’s time and money.
Unfortunately, patients have become
so used to being subjected to a battery of tests when
they visit their doctor , that they don’t even
stop to question their doctor as to why the tests
are being advised.
This means that they often end up having a large number
of tests done, many of which provide no useful information
whatsoever in the treatment of the infertile couple.
Let’s first look at why doctors
order so many tests in the first place . Often, it’s
much easier to order a test than to talk to the patient,
which means that many doctors will mindlessly order
a battery of tests in order to make a diagnosis. Also,
in many large IVF clinics, there is a standard “cook-book
procotol” of tests which must be ordered for
all patients, irrespective of whether you, as an individual,
actually need the test. Few patients ( or even doctors
for that matter) , question the cost effectiveness
or utility of these tests, which are mechanically
performed on a “routine” basis, especially
in many US clinics.
While often this “overtesting”
just wastes money, sometimes it does have more serious
consequences. Ordering tests is easy, but interpreting
them intelligently is hard ! Consider the common example
of the presence of “pus cells “ found
in a semen analysis. Often these round cells seen
on microscopic examination are actually sperm precursor
cells which are found in normal semen. However, they
are very commonly misreported as “pus cells”
and many doctors then promptly label the man as having
a genital tract infection, and treat him with an endless
variety of antibiotics, in order to try to “clear
up “ the infection.
The unreliability of medical tests also
poses a major problem today. The most obvious reason
can be attributed to laboratories whose functioning
is marked by factors such as poor quality control,
unskilled manpower and obsolete equipment. There is
little 'policing' or retesting, with the result that
the needed standards are not maintained. After all,
even a science graduate with a six-month diploma in
laboratory technology can set up a medical lab in
some countries, if he so desires. Most people tend
to rush to the nearest laboratory to get their tests
done, but such haste can be a big mistake.
After all, if the laboratory is not reliable, how
can you trust its report? You should try go to the
best laboratory possible - your life can depend upon
your test results !
Unfortunately, when infertile patients
change their doctor, many doctors insist on repeating
all the tests all over again, because they do not
trust the results of any lab other than their own.
This is very unfortunate, and patients often end up
wasting even more time and money.
Top
Ironically, it is true that sometimes
doctors do tests because the patients demand them.
This is very common, for example, with couples who
have unexplained infertility, who often demand that
the doctor continue performing tests till he can accurately
diagnose what the reason for their infertility is.
However, while modern reproductive technology is excellent
at solving problems “in vitro “ in the
IVF lab, it’s still not very good at diagnosing
them “in vivo “ in the human body.
What is our approach towards testing
our patients ? We try to simplify testing, by explaining
that there are only 4 things we need to test: eggs,
sperms uterus and tubes. The first day the bleeding
starts is called Day 1, and the semen analysis to
check the husband's sperm count and motility can be
done can be done on Day 3-4 , after requesting him
to abstain from ejaculation for at least 3 days .
The wife's blood is then tested for measuring the
levels of her four key reproductive hormones: prolactin,
LH ( luteining hormone) , FSH ( follicle stimulating
hormone) , TSH ( thyroid stimulating hormone). Since
these levels vary during the menstrual cycle, they
should be done between Day 3-5 of the cycle. We then
do a hysterosalpingogram (an X-ray of the uterus and
tubes) for her after the menstrual bleeding has stopped
- between Day 5-7, to confirm her uterus and tubes
are normal. We then see the couple on Day 9 with all
these reports and review the results . These three
basic tests allow us to check whether the eggs, sperm,
uterus and tubes are normal.
Here are some of the tests which many
doctors will subject their infertile patients to,
which we feel are wasteful and unnecessary.
1. An endometrial
biopsy ( EB ) or D&C ( dilatation and curettage)
for endometrial sampling ,
in order to “date” the endometrium. This
used to be a very popular test, which was performed
routinely in the past, in order to determine whether
the wife was ovulating; and to diagnose a luteal phase
defect. This is a painful and invasive test, which
is now considered to be obsolete. The only role for
a D&C today is if the doctor suspects endometrial
tuberculosis, a disease which is now becoming very
uncommon.
2. TORCH tests.
Certain infections called TORCH ( which stands for
TOxoplasmosis, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus and Herpes)
, may be a cause for a single miscarriage, but are
NOT a cause for repeated miscarriages. While a number
of specialists will do these tests, and even start
treatment based on the results, these tests are not
worthwhile for most patients. A positive TORCH test
simply means the patient has positive antibody levels
against that particular infection. Thus, a positive
Toxo IgG test means that the patient has anti-toxoplasmosis
antibodies which protect her against a repeat toxoplasmosis
infection. This means a positive test is actually
a good sign and suggests that the patient is protected
against that infection because she has been exposed
to that infection in the past. Unfortunately, many
doctors do not know how to interpret these results
and scare the patient into thinking that the positive
test result means she has an active infection which
can cause her to miscarry again. In fact, some doctors
will even attempt to "treat" the "infection"
! This wastes time and causes needless distress. If
your doctor asks you do a TORCH test after a miscarriage,
you should refuse and find a better doctor !
3. Doppler test
to check for a varicocele in the infertile man. In
the past, a varicocele was considered to be the commonest
cause of a low sperm count. In fact, this is still
a very controversial area, and many doctors still
believe that varicoceles do cause male infertility,
which is why they routinely subject all men with low
sperm counts to a Doppler test, to check for a varicocele.
However, the fact is that many men with large varicoceles
have excellent sperm counts, which is why correlating
cause (varicocele) and effect (low sperm count) is
very difficult. It is possible that the varicocele
may be an unrelated finding in infertile men - a "red
herring" so to speak. This means that surgical
correction of the varicocele may be of no use in improving
the sperm count - after all, if the varicocele is
not the cause of the problem, then how will treating
it help? In fact, controlled trials comparing varicocele
surgery with no therapy in men who have varicoceles
and a low sperm count have shown that the pregnancy
rate is the same – so that it does not seem
to make a difference whether or not the varicocele
is treated ! In such a case, why bother to diagnose
a condition which does not need to be
treated ?
Top
4. Sperm function
tests.
Since all doctors are aware of the limitations of
a conventional semen analysis (there is often poor
correlation between the results of a semen analysis
and male fertility potential) , many tests have been
devised to assess the fertilising potential of the
sperm. Many of these tests become “fashionable
“for a few years, and then they disappear when
doctors learn how useless they are. There is a lot
of overlap in the results of these tests in both fertile
and infertile men , and many fertile men will also
have abnormal results when subjected to these tests,
even though they have fathered babies ! This is because
while these tests do provide useful information for
groups of men in a research study, they do not provide
any useful prognostic information for the individual
patient. This means they often end up confusing a
perplexed issue even more. While tests like the zona-free
hamster egg assay were popular a few years ago, the
currently fashionable tests for sperm function are
the Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA) and the
sperm DNA Fragmentation assay. These test the integrity
of the DNA in the sperm nucleus, and thus the ability
of the sperm to fertilise the egg. Thus, we know that
men with a higher degree of DNA fragmentation have
a higher chance of being infertile. However, they
do not provide any useful information for the individual
patient, which means their utility in clinical practise
is very limited.
5. Laparoscopy.
Many doctors routinely perform a laparoscopy for infertile
women, and we used to do so ourselves until a few
years ago. However, we have now stopped doing so,
for the simple reason that we do not think it is cost
effective to subject all infertile women to this invasive
surgical procedure. We use a HSG ( hysterosalpingogram,
X-ray of the uterus and tubes) to determine if the
fallopian tubes are normal or not, because this is
much less expensive and does not involve surgery.
What about the argument that we may miss the diagnosis
of mild endometriosis or peritubal adhesions on the
HSG ? This is true, but since there is no evidence
that treating mild endometriosis or removing peritubal
adhesions at the time of laparoscopy helps to increase
fertility, we feel we are justified in our decision
not to subject our patients to this surgical procedure
on a “routine “ basis. Moreover, since
the next step in our treatment of women with a normal
HSG is IUI ( intrauterine insemination) , the results
of the laparoscopy do not affect our treatment plan
at all. The fact is that the “yield “
of routine laparoscopies in infertile women is very
low, since the vast majority are normal, and this
should also cause doctors to re-think their old-fashioned
approach to performing laparoscopies mindlessly for
all infertile women.
6. PCR for endometrial
TB.
This test has become very fashionable in India, where
endometrial tuberculosis ( TB) is still a cause of
female infertility. The gold standard for making a
diagnosis of endometrial TB is culturing the tubercle
bacilli from the endometrial curettings; or finding
tubercle granulomas on histopathological examination
of the endometrial curettings. However, it’s
easy to miss the diagnosis of TB with these conventional
tests, as a result of which doctors were very excited
when the technology of PCR was introduced to aid in
the diagnosis of TB. PCR ( polymerase chain reaction)
is a genetic technologic tool, which allows the lab
to amplify very small quantities of DNA fragments
which are unique to the tubercle bacillus, thus allowing
doctors to make an early diagnosis of TB. Unfortunately,
the test is still not robust, reliable or standardized,
with the result that there are many “false positives”
– women who do NOT have endometrial TB, but
still have a positive PCR test, because it was done
improperly. Many of these women are then even subjected
to 9 months of unnecessary anti-TB treatment , messing
up their unhappy lives even more !
Top
7. Immune testing
for patients with repeated IVF failures and repeated
miscarriages .
Patients who have failed repeated IVF cycles
even though apparently perfect embryos were transferred,
are understandably upset, frustrated and distressed.
They are looking for answers as to why they are not
getting pregnant, and a plausible reason is that their
body is “rejecting” their embryos. This
is why immune testing for patients with reproductive
failure has become very fashionable recently. There
is a long list of expensive tests which many labs
now perform – and these include: DQ Alpha, Leukocyte
Antibody Detection, Reproductive Immunophenotype,
ANA (Antinuclear Antibody), Anti-DNA/Histone Antibodies,
APA (Antiphospholipid Antibodies), Natural Killer
Cell Assay and TJ6 Protein. This mind –boggling
range of catchy acronyms conceals the fact that no
one knows whether the immune system is really responsible
for the failure of the embryos to implant in these
women. Many labs use different protocols to carry
out these tests, which are still poorly standardized.
This means that results for the same test from different
labs vary widely, making interpretation very difficult.
Also, intelligently interpreting these tests in individual
patients is virtually impossible, because of the considerable
overlap in the results in normal fertile women and
those who are infertile, since many fertile women
will also have abnormal results when subjected to
these tests. Sadly, most labs do not bother to standardize
their test results by doing them on normal fertile
women. This means that if a woman who has had an IVF
failure is subjected to these tests and has an abnormal
result, her doctor happily jumps to the erroneous
conclusion that he has now “diagnosed “
the reason for the IVF failure, little realizing that
the abnormal result could just be a “red herring”,
since “abnormal “ results are often found
in “normal “ fertile women as well. (
These are called “ false positives “ -
test results which are abnormal ('positive'), even
though the patient has no disease. ) A false positive
result causes needless anxiety, and will often lead
to a situation in which the patient will have to undergo
even more tests to prove or disprove the previous
results. Remember that if your doctor performs enough
tests on you, it is a mathematical certainty that
he will find something wrong with you. And if he finds
something wrong with you, he'll usually end up treating
you - whether you need treatment or not !
Interestingly, just like over-testing
can lead to problems, we have also noted that under-
testing can be equally problematic ! Thus, we have
seen many men who have been advised to undergo IVF
treatment, based on the report of just a single semen
analysis report, which was abnormal. It is essential
that the semen analysis be repeated, after a period
of 4- 6 weeks, to confirm that the abnormality is
persistent, because sperm counts do vary considerably,
even in normal men.
You should also make sure that your doctor examines
your original scans and X-rays, and not just the reports,
because his interpretation may be different from the
radiologist's. If you have undergone a series of scans,
they should be arranged in chronological order, so
that the doctor can compare them easily.
Top
Here's a checklist
of questions you should ask your doctor when a test
is recommended:
1. Why is the test being ordered?
2. How definitive is the test? Is it the 'gold standard'
for making the diagnosis? Will it reveal for sure
that a condition is present or not, or must it be
repeated or followed by more sophisticated tests?
3. What precisely will the doctor be looking for in
the results of these tests? What does he hope to learn
from the tests? How accurate are they?
Other relevant questions are
as follows:
1. Is there any pain? What are the side-effects?
What are the risks?
2. Is this the best test for your problem? Tests are
big money spinners today, because of which many doctors
have fallen victim to 'testitis'; (a disorder in which
doctors go in for all the tests available instead
of the most appropriate one!)
3. What is the risk of not having the test done, and
what are the alternatives?
The single most important question you
must ask is – “
How will the result of the test change the course
of my treatment?" And if the answer is
that it really won't, then maybe you don't need the
test at all !
In the final analysis, remember that
medical tests can be very helpful in pinpointing your
problem, but they need to be used wisely and well;
after all, doctors do not treat abnormal test results,
they treat patients !
Here is a checklist which highlights the important
factors you need to consider before in for a medical
test.
Medical Test checklist
Test name _____________________________________________
Description ____________________________________________
Purpose ______________________________________________
To confirm diagnosis?___________ Diagnosis _______________
To exclude diagnosis? ___________ Diagnosis ______________
Where will the test be done? Clinic? _________
Independent lab?________ Hospital? _________
Cost of test in: Clinic _______ Independent lab ________
Hospital _______
Are there risks associated with the test (i.e., is
the test invasive)?
___________
If yes, what risks? _____________________________________
Are there less invasive tests that might give the
same
information? ___________________________________________
If the test result is abnormal what will be done next?
__________
If the rest result is normal what will be done? _______________
COMMENTS ___________________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
You should fill out this checklist for
every medical test suggested.
The more invasive or expensive a test is, the more
important this
checklist becomes.